Every practitioner below lists public-sector as a focus industry. Sector context matters: it shapes which use cases are high-risk, what documentation buyers will demand, and what a realistic budget looks like.
EU AI Act readiness and ISO 42001 gap analysis for Austrian public bodies and the IT providers that serve them.
EU AI Act gap analysis, conformity files and ISO 42001 build-out for HR software vendors and French public bodies.
ISO 42001 gap analysis, implementation and training for government entities and banks in the UAE and Saudi Arabia.
NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 training for federal programme staff, defense contractors and their suppliers, in DC and online.
Barcelona law firm advising Spanish public bodies and edtech providers on EU AI Act and GDPR duties on retainer.
Brussels regulatory lawyers advising public authorities and financial firms on EU AI Act classification, contracts and conformity.
Remote EU AI Act readiness, policy and training for Irish public bodies and the suppliers that sell to them.
Fixed-price EU AI Act readiness sprints and AI training for legal professionals from a lawyer-led Dutch boutique.
Paris privacy consultancy extending outsourced-DPO work into EU AI Act maturity assessments, governance design and training.
ISO 42001 and EU AI Act consulting for small and mid-sized US businesses from a security practice founded in 2001, now part of CBIZ.
Munich boutique of lawyers with technical backgrounds advising on EU AI Act compliance, AI contracts and data law.
Fractional Chief Responsible AI Officer (vCRAIO) retainers and AI audit readiness aligned to the EU AI Act, ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF.
US certification body for ISO 42001 with a dedicated AI practice spanning NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act and AI security assessments.
UK AI governance advisory: EU AI Act readiness, ISO 42001 certification preparation and board-level AI literacy training.
Common questions
AI used by public authorities to evaluate eligibility for benefits and essential public services, in law enforcement, migration and asylum, or in the administration of justice is listed in Annex III, and public bodies deploying high-risk systems must complete a fundamental-rights impact assessment before use.
Of the 5 public-sector practitioners on this page that disclose a gap-analysis band, the most common is $5k–$15k (80% of those disclosing). Sector-specific documentation — bias testing, clinical evidence, model cards for procurement — drives the upper end. Compare disclosed bands and request intros from two or three shortlisted providers.