Skip to content
ComplyIndex

Annual data report · live edition

State of AI Compliance Pricing 2026

What do ISO 42001 and EU AI Act practitioners actually charge? This report answers with the price bands practitioners disclose on their ComplyIndex listings — no estimates, no vendor quotes, no rounding-up. It is recomputed every time the directory is rebuilt, so the numbers below reflect the current listing set (last verification: August 2026).

Headline numbers

Listings
93
53 verified (57%)
Countries
21
5 of 5 regions represented
Disclose gap band
32
34% of listings
Disclose retainer band
27
29% of listings
Median gap band
$5k–$15k
ordinal median, disclosed only

How to read this edition

Source. Every number is computed from the typed price_band_gap_analysis and price_band_retainer fields on published listings, exactly as disclosed by the practitioner or confirmed from their public rate card during verification. We never guess a band; anything unknown is stored as undisclosed.

n. Percentages in the band tables use the number of disclosing practitioners as the denominator; undisclosed listings are counted and shown but excluded. Percentages are rounded to whole numbers. Where a segment has fewer than five disclosing listings, treat its “most common band” as an anecdote, not a benchmark.

Bands, not prices. Practitioners disclose a band, so the report stays in bands. The “median” is an ordinal median over disclosed bands — the band the middle practitioner sits in — not a dollar figure.

What v1.1 adds. This is the live, listing-derived edition. The 2026 edition proper adds a practitioner survey (implementation and certification-audit fees, day rates, and what changed year on year) and will be published alongside these live tables. Until then, nothing on this page is survey data.

Key findings

  • Most common gap-analysis band: $5k–$15k (44% of the 32 practitioners disclosing a gap-analysis band).
  • Most common fractional / retainer band: $5k–$15k / month (52% of the 27 practitioners disclosing a retainer band).
  • 34% of listings disclose a gap-analysis band and 29% disclose a retainer band; 10% disclose both.
  • EU has the most listings (39 of 93, 42%); most common gap-analysis band there is $5k–$15k.
  • Firm size tracks price: solo practitioner firms most often quote Under $5k for a gap analysis, while 11–50 people firms most often quote $15k–$50k.
  • Consultancy is the most common provider type (40, 43% of listings).
  • 53 of 93 listings (57%) are verified — credentials confirmed against a registry or reviewed certificate. Unverified listings are included in pricing counts but flagged in the CSV.

Generated from the data on this page; they change when the listings change.

Gap-analysis price bands

A gap analysis is the usual first engagement: a scoped assessment of where an organisation stands against ISO/IEC 42001 or the EU AI Act, ending in a prioritised remediation plan. Bands are the practitioner’s typical fixed fee for that piece of work.

Gap-analysis price bandsn = 32 disclosing of 93 listings. Percentages are of disclosing practitioners and are rounded, so they may not sum to exactly 100.
Price bandPractitionersShare of disclosing
Under $5k7
22%
$5k–$15k14
44%
$15k–$50k11
34%
$50k+0
0%
Undisclosed61excluded from percentages

Fractional and retainer bands

Monthly bands for ongoing engagements — fractional AI governance officers, standing legal advisory, and post-certification support. Not every practitioner offers retainers, which is one reason disclosure is lower here than for gap analyses.

Retainer price bandsn = 27 disclosing of 93 listings. Percentages are of disclosing practitioners and are rounded, so they may not sum to exactly 100.
Monthly bandPractitionersShare of disclosing
Under $5k / month5
19%
$5k–$15k / month14
52%
$15k–$30k / month8
30%
$30k+ / month0
0%
Undisclosed66excluded from percentages

By region

Region is the practitioner’s HQ country, grouped as EU member states; UK, Switzerland, Norway and Iceland; the Americas; APAC (Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, India); and everywhere else. Where a practitioner serves clients is a separate field and is not used here.

Listings and typical bands by HQ region93 listings. “Most common band” is the mode among practitioners in that segment who disclosed one; the bracket shows how many did.
RegionListingsVerifiedMost common gap-analysis bandMost common retainer band
EU
39 (42%)
23$5k–$15k (10 of 16)$5k–$15k / month (5 of 11)
UK & non-EU Europe
19 (20%)
9Under $5k (2 of 4)$5k–$15k / month (3 of 6)
Americas
26 (28%)
14Under $5k (2 of 6)$5k–$15k / month (4 of 8)
APAC
7 (8%)
6$15k–$50k (2 of 4)$5k–$15k / month (1 of 1)
Other
2 (2%)
1$5k–$15k (1 of 2)$5k–$15k / month (1 of 1)

By firm size

Headcount of the practice as declared on the listing. Solo practitioners and small boutiques dominate this market; the table shows whether their quoted bands differ from those of larger firms.

Listings and typical bands by firm size93 listings. “Most common band” is the mode among practitioners in that segment who disclosed one; the bracket shows how many did.
Firm sizeListingsVerifiedMost common gap-analysis bandMost common retainer band
Solo practitioner
15 (16%)
12Under $5k (5 of 6)$5k–$15k / month (4 of 9)
2–10 people
23 (25%)
9$5k–$15k (10 of 13)Under $5k / month (2 of 3)
11–50 people
29 (31%)
18$15k–$50k (10 of 13)$5k–$15k / month (6 of 8)
51–250 people
13 (14%)
11$5k–$15k / month (3 of 6)
250+ people
13 (14%)
3$15k–$30k / month (1 of 1)

By provider type

Consultancies, law firms, certification bodies, fractional officers, training providers and independent auditors price differently because they sell different things. Certification bodies, for instance, rarely quote a gap-analysis band because the audit itself is scoped per applicant.

Listings and typical bands by provider type93 listings. “Most common band” is the mode among practitioners in that segment who disclosed one; the bracket shows how many did.
Provider typeListingsVerifiedMost common gap-analysis bandMost common retainer band
Consultancy
40 (43%)
21$5k–$15k (14 of 28)$5k–$15k / month (5 of 10)
Law firm
17 (18%)
9$5k–$15k / month (5 of 9)
Certification body
15 (16%)
7
Fractional AI governance officer
9 (10%)
8$5k–$15k / month (4 of 8)
Training provider
8 (9%)
4
Independent auditor
4 (4%)
4Under $5k (4 of 4)

Disclosure rate

How many practitioners publish a band at all. Disclosure is itself a market signal — a listing with public bands tends to be a fixed-scope, productised practice — and it sets the n for every table above.

Price-band disclosureshare of all 93 listings. Unlike the band tables, undisclosed listings are in the denominator here.
Listings that…CountShare of all listings
Disclose a gap-analysis band32
34%
Disclose a retainer band27
29%
Disclose at least one band50
54%
Disclose both bands9
10%

Framework coverage

Context for the pricing tables: which frameworks the listed practitioners cover. One listing can cover several, so shares add to more than 100%.

Listings by framework — share of all 93 listings; multi-valued.
FrameworkListingsVerifiedShare
ISO/IEC 42001674372%
EU AI Act613466%
ISO/IEC 27001271229%
NIST AI RMF261828%
GDPR23725%
NYC Local Law 14411512%
SOC 210411%
Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205)9710%
Illinois HB 3773656%
Texas TRAIGA333%

Get the data

Every table on this page plus anonymised per-listing rows (provider type, HQ region, firm size, both bands, verified flag). No names, URLs or contact details. CC BY 4.0 — cite ComplyIndex and link to this page.

Practitioners: contribute to the 2026 survey

The survey opens with the v1.1 edition and covers the fees this page cannot see yet: implementation, certification audit, day rates, and year-on-year change. The fastest way to be invited is to have a listing — submit or claim yours and disclose your bands.

Want the edition when it lands? The newsletter form in the footer sends one email per release, nothing else.

Sponsored by — available

Report sponsorship is sold to software vendors — GRC, AI governance and assurance platforms — never to listed practitioners. A sponsor gets a logo and a section credit; they get no say over the data, the method, or which practitioners appear.

How to get in touch about sponsorship

Inclusion in this dataset is not an endorsement, and a disclosed band is not a quote. Verification covers credentials and business existence (see how verification works); it does not audit prices. Payment never influences verification, and neither featured placement nor sponsorship changes anything on this page.