Skip to content
ComplyIndex

Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205) compliance practitioners

Practitioners
9
Verified
7
Last verified
Countries served
30

Colorado's SB 24-205 imposes a duty of reasonable care on developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems used in consequential decisions, with impact assessments, notices and risk-management programmes; its application date was moved to 30 June 2026. Practitioners below list Colorado AI Act coverage.

Compare practitioners (9 listings)

Refine these results
FeaturedVerified July 2026Consultancy

Oxbow Ridge Advisory

AI governance and LL144 compliance for HR tech vendors and their employer customers, in New York and Toronto.

Frameworks
NYC LL144 · Colorado AI Act · NIST AI RMF +1
Serves
US, Canada
Gap analysis
$5k–$15k
Retainer
$5k–$15k / month
Firm size
11–50 people
HQ
New York, United States
IAPP AIGPISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer
Verified June 2026Independent auditor

Gansevoort Bias Review

Independent NYC Local Law 144 bias audits for a single hiring tool, fixed fee, three-week turnaround.

Frameworks
NYC LL144 · Illinois HB3773 · Colorado AI Act +1
Serves
US
Gap analysis
Under $5k
Retainer
Undisclosed
Firm size
Solo practitioner
HQ
New York, United States
IAPP AIGP
Verified July 2026Consultancy

Saddleback Compliance Works

Colorado AI Act gap analysis and implementation for insurers, lenders and other Colorado deployers.

Frameworks
Colorado AI Act · NIST AI RMF · ISO 42001
Serves
US
Gap analysis
$5k–$15k
Retainer
Undisclosed
Firm size
2–10 people
HQ
Denver, United States
ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer
Verified August 2026Fractional AI governance officer

Beacon Row Governance

Fractional AI governance lead for growth-stage medtech and clinical software companies, six-month minimum retainers.

Frameworks
ISO 42001 · NIST AI RMF · EU AI Act +1
Serves
US, EU
Gap analysis
Undisclosed
Retainer
$15k–$30k / month
Firm size
Solo practitioner
HQ
Boston, United States
IAPP AIGP
Verified July 2026Fractional AI governance officer

Larchmont Fair Systems

Fractional AI governance and LL144 audit ownership for HR tech and edtech companies, from Seattle, remote.

Frameworks
NIST AI RMF · Colorado AI Act · NYC LL144 +1
Serves
US
Gap analysis
Undisclosed
Retainer
$5k–$15k / month
Firm size
Solo practitioner
HQ
Seattle, United States
IAPP CIPPIAPP AIGP
Verified August 2026Law firm

Wabash Kettering LLP

Chicago employment and insurance counsel for AI in hiring and underwriting under Illinois HB 3773 and the EU AI Act.

Frameworks
Illinois HB3773 · NYC LL144 · Colorado AI Act +1
Serves
US, EU
Gap analysis
Undisclosed
Retainer
$5k–$15k / month
Firm size
11–50 people
HQ
Chicago, United States
Bar admission
Verified July 2026Law firm

Pecan Hollow LLP

Austin law firm advising on Texas TRAIGA and multi-state AI employment and lending rules, retainer or fixed fee.

Frameworks
Texas TRAIGA · Colorado AI Act · NYC LL144 +1
Serves
US
Gap analysis
Undisclosed
Retainer
$15k–$30k / month
Firm size
51–250 people
HQ
Austin, United States
Bar admission×2
Listed · unverifiedConsultancy

Kestrel Metric Lab

Statisticians performing NYC Local Law 144 bias audits and multi-state disparate-impact analyses for hiring tools.

Frameworks
NYC LL144 · Illinois HB3773 · Colorado AI Act
Serves
US
Gap analysis
Under $5k
Retainer
Undisclosed
Firm size
2–10 people
HQ
New York, United States
PhD Statistics
Listed · unverifiedLaw firm

ZwillGen (AI Division, formerly Luminos.Law)

DC technology law firm pairing AI legal counsel with in-house bias audits and red teaming for LL144, Colorado and EU AI Act duties.

Frameworks
NYC LL144 · Colorado AI Act · EU AI Act +1
Serves
US, United Kingdom
Gap analysis
Undisclosed
Retainer
Undisclosed
Firm size
11–50 people
HQ
Washington, DC, United States
Bar admissionIAPP AIGPIAPP CIPP

Featured = paid placement. It buys position on this page only and never affects verification or the ✓ badge. How verification works

All US state AI law pages

Common questions

Who has to comply with the Colorado AI Act?

Developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems that make or substantially influence consequential decisions about Colorado residents — in employment, lending, housing, insurance, healthcare, education, legal and essential government services — from 30 June 2026. Smaller deployers have narrower duties, but the risk-management and notice obligations reach most companies using AI in hiring or lending, and substantial compliance with the NIST AI RMF is a recognised defence.

How much does a Colorado AI Act impact assessment cost?

A single-system impact assessment is a small engagement; a programme-level risk management framework (often aligned to the NIST AI RMF, which the Act references) is a larger project. Of the 4 Colorado practitioners on this page that disclose a gap-analysis band, the most common is Under $5k (50% of those disclosing).